Skip to main content
CATCongressional Accountability Tracker
OfficialsLegislationCommitteesWatch LivePulseForecastMisconductPresidentLearn
CAT

Congressional Accountability Tracker. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Forecast

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live
  • About This Site

Data Sources

Congress.gov
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission
Campaign finance
VoteView
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Congressional Accountability Tracker

HouseH.Con.Res. 12119th Congress

Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.

← Back to bill overviewView on Congress.gov →

Full Text

Official text as published. Use Ctrl+F / Cmd+F to search within the document.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 12

                Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2025

   Mr. Womack (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. 
Bentz, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Luttrell, Mr. LaLota, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Bost, 
Mr. Costa, Mr. Finstad, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Moylan, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Mrvan, 
  Mr. Ciscomani, Mr. Sessions, Ms. Sewell, Mr. Flood, Mrs. Miller of 
    Illinois, Mr. Ezell, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Lucas, Mr. 
     Garbarino, Ms. Stansbury, Mr. Lawler, Ms. Maloy, Mr. Kelly of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Alford, Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. 
   Collins, Mr. Kennedy of New York, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. 
Bilirakis, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Keating, Mr. Langworthy, Ms. De La Cruz, 
Mr. Graves, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Golden of Maine, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Rogers of 
 Alabama, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Meuser, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Bean of Florida, 
 Mr. Turner of Ohio, Mr. Rulli, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Vasquez, Mr. Bishop, 
Ms. Budzinski, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Amodei of 
 Nevada, Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Davis of North 
   Carolina, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. 
   Carter of Louisiana, Mr. Cole, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. Smith of 
Nebraska, Mrs. Sykes, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Comer, Mr. Kean, 
 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Moran, 
  Mr. Yakym, Mr. Valadao, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Norman, Mr. Connolly, Mr. 
   Bergman, Mr. Van Orden, Mrs. McIver, Mr. Perry, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. 
 Carey, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Latta, 
   Ms. Van Duyne, Mr. Guest, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Mann, Mr. Weber of 
 Texas, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Kustoff, Mr. Fallon, 
 Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Deluzio, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Sorensen, 
 Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Baumgartner, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Burlison, 
 and Mr. Pfluger) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.

Whereas the United States enjoys broadcasting and sound recording industries 
        that are the envy of the world, due to the symbiotic relationship that 
        has existed among these industries for many decades;
Whereas, for nearly a century, Congress has rejected repeated calls by the 
        recording industry to impose a performance fee on local radio stations 
        for simply playing music on the radio and upsetting the mutually 
        beneficial relationship between local radio and the recording industry;
Whereas local radio stations provide free publicity and promotion to the 
        recording industry and performers of music in the form of radio air 
        play, interviews with performers, introduction of new performers, 
        concert promotions, and publicity that promotes the sale of music, 
        concert tickets, ring tones, music videos and associated merchandise;
Whereas Congress found that ``the sale of many sound recordings and the careers 
        of many performers benefited considerably from airplay and other 
        promotional activities provided by both noncommercial and advertiser-
        supported, free over-the-air broadcasting'';
Whereas local radio broadcasters provide tens of thousands of hours of essential 
        local news and weather information during times of national emergencies 
        and natural disasters, as well as public affairs programming, sports, 
        and hundreds of millions of dollars of time for public service 
        announcements and local fundraising efforts for worthy charitable 
        causes, all of which are jeopardized if local radio stations are forced 
        to divert revenues to pay for a new performance fee;
Whereas there are many thousands of local radio stations that will suffer severe 
        economic hardship if any new performance fee is imposed, as will many 
        other small businesses that play music including bars, restaurants, 
        retail establishments, sports and other entertainment venues, shopping 
        centers and transportation facilities; and
Whereas the hardship that would result from a new performance fee would hurt 
        American businesses, and ultimately the American consumers who rely on 
        local radio for news, weather, and entertainment; and such a performance 
        fee is not justified when the current system has produced the most 
        prolific and innovative broadcasting, music, and sound recording 
        industries in the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress should not impose any new performance fee, tax, royalty, 
or other charge relating to the public performance of sound recordings 
on a local radio station for broadcasting sound recordings over the 
air, or on any business for such public performance of sound 
recordings.
                                 <all>