Skip to main content
CATCongressional Accountability Tracker
OfficialsLegislationCommitteesWatch LivePulseForecastMisconductPresidentLearn
CAT

Congressional Accountability Tracker. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Forecast

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live
  • About This Site

Data Sources

Congress.gov
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission
Campaign finance
VoteView
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Congressional Accountability Tracker

HouseH. Rpt. 119-5712026-03-25

SAVE OUR SHRIMPERS ACT

← Financial Services CommitteeView on GovInfo →

Summary

H. Rpt. 119-571 accompanies the "Save Our Shrimpers Act" — legislation that falls within the Financial Services Committee's jurisdiction. Committee reports serve as the official legislative history of a bill, documenting what the legislation would do and why the committee recommends passage. Reports of this kind include the committee's section-by-section analysis, any amendments adopted during markup, the Congressional Budget Office cost estimate, dissenting views from minority members, and the legal basis for the legislation. Courts and agencies consult committee reports when interpreting enacted laws, making these documents important beyond the immediate legislative moment.

Full Text

Official report text. Use Ctrl+F / Cmd+F to search within the document.

House Report 119-571 - SAVE OUR SHRIMPERS ACT

[House Report 119-571]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

119th Congress }                                              { Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
  2d Session   }                                              { 119-571

=======================================================================

 
                         SAVE OUR SHRIMPERS ACT

                            ----------------
                                
 March 25, 2026.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                            ----------------
                                
    Mr. Hill of Arkansas, from the Committee on Financial Services, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 2071]

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

    The Committee on Financial Services, to whom was referred 
the bill (H.R. 2071) to prohibit Federal funds from being made 
available to international financial institutions for the 
purposes of financing foreign shrimp farms, and for other 
purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon 
with amendments and recommends that the bill as amended do 
pass.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
Purpose and Summary..............................................     2
Background and Need for Legislation..............................     2
Committee Consideration..........................................     2
Related Hearings.................................................     3
Committee Votes..................................................     3
Committee Oversight Findings.....................................     6
Performance Goals and Objectives.................................     6
Committee Cost Estimate..........................................     6
New Budget Authority and CBO Cost Estimate.......................     6
Unfunded Mandates Statement......................................     7
Earmark Statement................................................     7
Federal Advisory Committee Act Statement.........................     7
Applicability to the Legislative Branch..........................     7
Duplication of Federal Programs..................................     7
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation...................     7
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............     8
Documents Included by Unanimous Consent..........................     9

    The amendments are as follows:
  Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

  This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Shrimpers Act''.

SEC. 2. VOICE AND VOTE REQUIREMENT.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the 
United States Executive Director at each international financial 
institution (as defined in section 1701(c)(2) of the International 
Financial Institutions Act) to use the voice and vote of the United 
States to oppose any financial assistance by such institution for any 
project to support shrimp farming, shrimp processing, or the export of 
shrimp in a borrowing country.
  (b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of the Treasury may waive 
subsection (a) with respect to a project upon notifying the Congress 
that the waiver is in the national interest of the United States.
  (c) Expiration.--Subsection (a) shall have no force or effect after 
the end of the 7-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act.

    Amend the title so as to read:
    A bill to require the United States Executive Directors at 
the international financial institutions to oppose certain 
projects involving shrimp production.

                          PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

    H.R. 2071, the Save Our Shrimpers Act, was introduced on 
March 11, 2025, by Republican Representative Troy Nehls (TX-
22). This legislation requires the Secretary of the Treasury to 
direct U.S. Executive Directors at the international financial 
institutions (IFIs) to use the voice and vote of the United 
States to oppose financial assistance for projects that support 
foreign shrimp farming, processing, or export. This bill also 
provides waiver authority to the Secretary of the Treasury and 
sunsets the mandate at seven years from enactment.

                  BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

    Over the past several decades, U.S. shrimp consumption has 
grown substantially, with growth captured by foreign imports, 
especially from Ecuador, India, and Indonesia. The U.S. shrimp 
industry has seen its market share decrease from 50 percent to 
less than 10 percent of domestic consumption, at least in part 
due to foreign subsidies and unfair trade practices.
    Following a successful antidumping petition by the American 
Shrimp Processors Association in 2023, the Biden Administration 
stopped supporting shrimping projects at the IFIs. The Trump 
Administration has stepped up support for the shrimp industry 
by proactively opposing such projects. It remains unclear how 
many shrimp-focused projects there are at the IFIs, with most 
support likely routed through more general financing 
structures.

                        COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

                             119TH CONGRESS

    On March 11, 2025, Representative Nehls introduced H.R. 
2071, the Save Our Shrimpers Act, with Representatives Clay 
Higgins (R-LA), Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), Troy Carter (D-LA), 
Nancy Mace (R-SC), Randy Weber (R-TX), Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), 
Julia Letlow (R-LA), Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), Greg Murphy (R-
NC), John Rutherford (R-FL), Byron Donalds (R-FL), Barry Moore 
(R-AL), Brian Babin (R-TX), Mike Ezell (R-MS), Michael Cloud 
(R-TX), Russell Fry (R-SC), and Buddy Carter (R-GA) as original 
cosponsors. Representatives Mike Haridopolos (R-FL), David 
Rouzer (R-NC), and Donald Davis (D-NC) were added subsequently 
as cosponsors.
    The bill was referred solely to the Committee on Financial 
Services. The bill was attached to the February 10, 2026, 
hearing titled ``Priced Out of the American Dream: 
Understanding the Policies Behind Rising Costs of Housing and 
Borrowing.''
    On March 4, 2026, the Committee on Financial Services met 
in open session to consider, among others, H.R. 2071. The 
Committee ordered H.R. 2071, as amended, to be reported with a 
favorable recommendation to the House of Representatives.

                             118TH CONGRESS

    On April 10, 2024, Representative Nehls introduced H.R. 
7932, the Save Our Shrimpers Act, with Representatives Higgins, 
Vicente Gonzalez, Garret Graves (R-LA), Ezell, Moore, Mace, 
Donalds, Weber, Babin, Fry, Luna, Letlow, and Bilirakis as 
original cosponsors. Representatives Rouzer, Michael Cloud (R-
TX), Greg Murphy (R-NC), Bill Posey (R-FL), Jerry Carl (R-AL), 
Rutherford, Buddy Carter, Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), Blaine 
Luetkemeyer (R-MO), and Troy Carter (D-LA) were added 
subsequently as cosponsors. The bill was referred solely to the 
Committee on Financial Services. There was no further 
legislative action on H.R. 7932 in the 118th Congress.

                            RELATED HEARINGS

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(6) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the following hearing was used to 
develop H.R. 2071:
    On February 10, 2026, the Committee on Financial Services 
held a hearing titled ``Priced Out of the American Dream: 
Understanding the Policies Behind Rising Costs of Housing and 
Borrowing.'' A discussion draft version of H.R. 2071 was 
attached to this hearing. The hearing examined how policies in 
the financial services and housing sectors contributed to 
rising cost-of-living pressures for American families by 
restricting access to capital and credit. The hearing assessed 
the impact of inflationary policies, regulatory overreach, and 
restrictive supervisory policies that have increased borrowing 
costs, weakened capital formation, and constrained housing 
supply. The Committee heard testimony from: Mr. Brian Brooks, 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Meridian Capital Group; 
Mr. Kevin O'Leary, Chairman, O'Leary Ventures; Mr. Stephen 
Moore, Co-Founder, Unleash Prosperity; Dr. Darrick Hamilton, 
University Professor, the New School, and Chief Economist, AFL-
CIO.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives requires the Committee Report to include record 
votes on the motion to report legislation and amendments 
thereto.
    On March 4, 2026, the Committee ordered H.R. 2071, as 
amended, to be reported favorably to the House by a recorded 
vote of 42 yeas and 1 nay, a quorum being present. (Record Vote 
No. FC-250)
    Before the question to report was called, the Committee 
adopted an amendment in the nature of a substitute, designated 
HR2071ANS, offered by Republican Representative Andy Barr (KY-
06) on behalf of Republican Representative Warren Davidson (OH-
08). The amendment was adopted by voice vote.

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 

                      COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS

    Pursuant to clause 3(c) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the findings and recommendations of 
the Committee, based on oversight activities under clause 
2(b)(1) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
are incorporated in the descriptive portions of this report.

                    PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the goal of H.R. 2071 is to require 
the use of United States influence to oppose IFIs support for 
foreign shrimp industries.

                        COMMITTEE COST ESTIMATE

    Clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison of the 
costs that would be incurred in carrying out H.R. 2071. Clause 
3(d)(2)(B) of that Rule provides that this requirement does not 
apply when, as with the present report, the Committee adopts as 
its own the cost estimate for the bill prepared by the Director 
of the Congressional Budget Office.

               NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY AND CBO COST ESTIMATE

    With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(2) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and with respect 
to requirements of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives and section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee adopts as its 
own the cost estimate for the bill prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office.

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 

    H.R. 2071 would require U.S. executive directors at 
international financial institutions, such as the International 
Monetary Fund and the World Bank, to oppose the extension of 
financial assistance by those institutions to foreign countries 
for farming, processing, or exporting shrimp. That requirement 
would expire seven years after enactment. On the basis of 
information about the costs of diplomatic efforts to influence 
the actions of international organizations, CBO estimates that 
the advocacy required by the bill would cost less than $500,000 
over the 2026-2036 period. Such spending would be subject to 
the availability of appropriated funds.
    The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Sunita D'Monte. 
The estimate was reviewed by Christina Hawley Anthony, Deputy 
Director of Budget Analysis.
                                         Phillip L. Swagel,
                             Director, Congressional Budget Office.

                      UNFUNDED MANDATES STATEMENT

    Pursuant to Section 423 of the Congressional Budget and 
Impoundment Control Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-344 (as amended 
by Section 101(a)(2) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995, Pub. L. No. 104-4), the Committee adopts as its own the 
cost estimate prepared by the Director of the Congressional 
Budget Office (CBO) pursuant to section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

                           EARMARK STATEMENT

    In compliance with clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, this bill, as reported, contains no 
congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff 
benefits as defined in clause 9(e), 9(f), or 9(g) of rule XXI.

                FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACT STATEMENT

    No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this 
legislation.

                APPLICABILITY TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

                    DUPLICATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS

    Pursuant to clause 3(c)(5) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the Committee states that no 
provision of the bill establishes or reauthorizes a program of 
the Federal Government known to be duplicative of another 
Federal program, including any program that was included in a 
report to Congress pursuant to section 21 of the Public Law 
111-139 or the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance.

             SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION

Section 1. Short title

    Section 1 provides the short title is the ``Save Our 
Shrimpers Act.''

Section 2. Voice and vote requirement

    Section 2 requires the Secretary of the Treasury to 
instruct the Executive Directors at each of the international 
financial institutions to use the voice and vote of the United 
States to oppose financial assistance for projects supporting 
the farming, processing or export of shrimp.

         CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

    H.R. 2071 does not repeal or amend any section of a 
statute. Therefore, the Office of Legislative Counsel did not 
prepare the report required under clause 3(e) of rule XIII of 
the House of Representatives.

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]  

                                [all]