Skip to main content
CATCongressional Accountability Tracker
OfficialsLegislationCommitteesWatch LivePulseForecastMisconductPresidentLearn
CAT

Congressional Accountability Tracker. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Forecast

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live
  • About This Site

Data Sources

Congress.gov
Bills, members, votesGovInfo
Floor speeches, reports, bill textFederal Election Commission
Campaign financeVoteView
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)GovTrack
Misconduct data (CC0)U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Congressional Accountability Tracker

Floor Speech2026-03-18

REMOVAL OF NAME OF MEMBER AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 1007

Michael Lawler
Michael Lawler
RNY-17 · Representative
Share:

Full Text

REMOVAL OF NAME OF MEMBER AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 1007

Congressional Record, Volume 172 Issue 49 (Wednesday, March 18, 2026) [Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 18, 2026)] [House] [Page H2584] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [ www.gpo.gov ] REMOVAL OF NAME OF MEMBER AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 1007 Mr. LAWLER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to remove the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Smith) as cosponsor of H.R. 1007 because he was inadvertently added to the legislation by my staff. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from New York? There was no objection. ____________________

Referenced legislation: HR1007, HR1007
View original source →