Skip to main content
CATCongressional Accountability Tracker
OfficialsLegislationCommitteesWatch LivePulseForecastMisconductPresidentLearn
CAT

Congressional Accountability Tracker. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Forecast

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live
  • About This Site

Data Sources

Congress.gov
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission
Campaign finance
VoteView
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Congressional Accountability Tracker

Darin LaHood

Darin LaHood

RepublicanIL-16 · Representative
OverviewStatementsBillsFinanceVotesElections
4
Wins
0
Losses
4
Races

2024

House · IL-16
Won
RDarin LaHoodWinner
310,925 votes99.9%
WScott K. Summers
183 votes0.1%
Margin of victory: +99.9%

In the 2024 House race for IL-16, Darin LaHood (R) defeated Scott K. Summers (W) 99.9% to 0.1%. Darin LaHood received 310,925 votes compared to 183 for Scott K. Summers, a dominant 99.9-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

As the incumbent, Darin LaHood benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. The 2024 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket. The wide margin suggests this district is firmly in the Republican column for the foreseeable future.

2022

House · IL-16
Won
RDarin LaHoodWinner
197,621 votes66.3%
DElizabeth Haderlein
100,325 votes33.7%
Margin of victory: +32.7%

In the 2022 House race for IL-16, Darin LaHood (R) defeated Elizabeth Haderlein (D) 66.3% to 33.7%. Darin LaHood received 197,621 votes compared to 100,325 for Elizabeth Haderlein, a dominant 32.7-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

This was an open-seat race with no incumbent running — Adam Kinzinger (R) previously held the seat. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. As a Republican, Darin LaHood benefited from the historical midterm penalty against the president's party — with a Democrat in the White House, the opposition typically gains seats. The wide margin suggests this district is firmly in the Republican column for the foreseeable future.

2018

House · IL-18
Won
RDarin LahoodWinner
195,927 votes67.2%
DJunius Rodriguez
95,486 votes32.8%

In the 2018 House race for IL-18, Darin Lahood (R) defeated Junius Rodriguez (D) 67.2% to 32.8%. Darin Lahood received 195,927 votes compared to 95,486 for Junius Rodriguez, a dominant 34.5-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

As the incumbent, Darin Lahood benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. As a Republican, Darin Lahood won despite the historical midterm penalty against the president's party (Republican Trump was in office).

2016

House · IL-18
Won
RDarin LahoodWinner
250,506 votes72.1%
DJunius Rodriguez
96,770 votes27.9%

In the 2016 House race for IL-18, Darin Lahood (R) defeated Junius Rodriguez (D) 72.1% to 27.9%. Darin Lahood received 250,506 votes compared to 96,770 for Junius Rodriguez, a dominant 44.3-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

This was an open-seat race with no incumbent running — Aaron Schock (R) previously held the seat. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. The 2016 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket.