Skip to main content
CATCongressional Accountability Tracker
OfficialsLegislationCommitteesWatch LivePulseForecastMisconductPresidentLearn
CAT

Congressional Accountability Tracker. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Forecast

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live
  • About This Site

Data Sources

Congress.gov
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission
Campaign finance
VoteView
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Congressional Accountability Tracker

Jimmy Panetta

Jimmy Panetta

DemocratCA-19 · Representative
OverviewStatementsBillsFinanceVotesElections
4
Wins
0
Losses
4
Races

2024

House · CA-19
Won
DJimmy PanettaWinner
252,458 votes69.3%
RJason Michael Anderson
111,862 votes30.7%
Margin of victory: +38.6%

In the 2024 House race for CA-19, Jimmy Panetta (D) defeated Jason Michael Anderson (R) 69.3% to 30.7%. Jimmy Panetta received 252,458 votes compared to 111,862 for Jason Michael Anderson, a dominant 38.6-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

As the incumbent, Jimmy Panetta benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. The 2024 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket. The wide margin suggests this district is firmly in the Democrat column for the foreseeable future.

2022

House · CA-19
Won
DJimmy PanettaWinner
194,494 votes68.7%
RJeff Gorman
88,816 votes31.4%
Margin of victory: +37.3%

In the 2022 House race for CA-19, Jimmy Panetta (D) defeated Jeff Gorman (R) 68.7% to 31.4%. Jimmy Panetta received 194,494 votes compared to 88,816 for Jeff Gorman, a dominant 37.3-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

This was an open-seat race with no incumbent running — Zoe Lofgren (D) previously held the seat. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. As a Democrat, Jimmy Panetta won despite the historical midterm penalty against the president's party (Democrat Biden was in office). The wide margin suggests this district is firmly in the Democrat column for the foreseeable future.

2018

House · CA-20
Won
DJimmy PanettaWinner
367,354 votes81.4%
nRonald Paul Kabat
84,088 votes18.6%

In the 2018 House race for CA-20, Jimmy Panetta (D) defeated Ronald Paul Kabat (n) 81.4% to 18.6%. Jimmy Panetta received 367,354 votes compared to 84,088 for Ronald Paul Kabat, a dominant 62.7-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

As the incumbent, Jimmy Panetta benefited from name recognition, established constituent services, and the roughly 2-3 point advantage that sitting members typically enjoy. As a Democrat, Jimmy Panetta benefited from the historical midterm penalty against the president's party — with a Republican in the White House, the opposition typically gains seats.

2016

House · CA-20
Won
DJimmy PanettaWinner
180,980 votes70.8%
RCasey Lucius
74,811 votes29.3%

In the 2016 House race for CA-20, Jimmy Panetta (D) defeated Casey Lucius (R) 70.8% to 29.3%. Jimmy Panetta received 180,980 votes compared to 74,811 for Casey Lucius, a dominant 41.5-point margin reflecting a safely partisan district.

This was an open-seat race with no incumbent running — Sam Farr (D) previously held the seat. Open seats typically attract stronger candidates and heavier spending from both parties. The 2016 presidential election drove higher voter turnout, which can help or hurt down-ballot candidates depending on the top of the ticket.